Navigate
HomeStart here
MusingsResearch & long-form
BuildingProjects & learnings
WorkProfessional practice
RunningTraining & races
AboutValues & identity
Life & PlacesCulture, food, travel, cities
Notes & ArchiveJournals, essays, portfolio

Acquired · Glossary · Concept

Scale economies

Cost advantages a large player has that smaller competitors structurally can't match, which then reinforce themselves.

3 episodes1 company2 related concepts

Companies that practice scale economies

TSMC2 strategies

Process technology leadership at any capex cost2010s-present

TSMC outspends Samsung and Intel on capex by ~2x. Each leading-edge node costs $15-20B+. The bet: be 12-24 months ahead on the process curve, win every leading-edge customer, fund the next node from those revenues. Compounds for 15+ years.

  • Cumulative 2015-2024 capex: TSMC $198.5B, Samsung DS $238.5B, Intel $169B. The leading-edge race is a multi-hundred-billion-dollar arms race that only three companies on earth can credibly fund.
    [/api/semiconductor-capex (live data) + TSMC annual reports]

Geographic concentration AS the strategic asset1987-present

TSMC's leading-edge fabs cluster in Hsinchu and Tainan. The cluster effect — talent density, supplier ecosystem, government coordination — is itself a moat. The geopolitical concentration risk (Taiwan-China) is the cost; the cluster productivity is the benefit. Foreign fabs (Arizona, Japan) are insurance, not the engine.

Episodes that exemplify this

Concept matched on scale-economies