The saved folder · read August 16 and October 1, 2026
The threads I come back to.
An Instagram saved folder, read as one document. Forty-two saves between the middle of July and the middle of August, after the last folder became On Agape. The brief for the read, verbatim: “understand what threads I come back to: philosophies, social theory research that verifies the platitude, or else I’m less interested.”
So: the threads that recur, the lines kept, and then the check. Does a philosophy worth trusting, or research that can be cited, back the platitude? If not, it goes in the last section with the reason. Then, for each thread, what it connects to on this site.
The rule
A saved line earns its place when a philosophy worth trusting, or research that can be cited, backs it. A line that only sounds true goes in the last section, with the reason.
How it was read: First read: every save was pulled with its caption, carousels slide by slide, reels by caption only. Second read: the saves arrived as phone screenshots, so slides and captions were read from the screenshots, every byline was checked off-platform, and anything cropped out of frame is marked unread rather than guessed at.
The body is not malfunctioning.
The biggest cluster in the folder: nine slides on the nervous system, a psychologist on immigrant daughters, a poet on peace feeling boring. One idea under all of it: the reactions that read as proof of being broken are adaptations that once worked.
The saved lines
“Your window of tolerance isn't just about your ability to handle hard feels like grief, fear, and anger, but it also includes our capacity to tolerate joy, pleasure, and love without distress. And so when we're living the life of our dreams, our window may need to expand so that we can actually hold all of the joy, pleasure, and love without destroying it.”
Margeaux Feldman (@softcore_trauma), the first of nine slides
“The parts of you that sabotage the good thing aren't trying to ruin your life but are young, terrified parts doing the only job they were ever given, keeping you safe from hope that might not pan out. And so what if we stopped trying to exile them and started asking what they've been so scared of this whole time?”
Margeaux Feldman
“Setting a boundary can feel like danger in your body even when you're completely safe, because for some of us saying no once meant losing love, or worse. And so the guilt and nausea that flood in when you finally hold a limit aren't signs you did something wrong. They're the echo of a time when having needs wasn't allowed.”
Margeaux Feldman
“Attachment wounds can only be healed in relationship and not in isolation, which is the cruelest part, because the thing that hurt us was other people and the thing that heals us is also other people. And so letting someone stay, letting someone see you, is not weakness. It's the entire repair happening in real time.”
Margeaux Feldman
“For so many daughters of immigrants, hyper-independence wasn't a personality trait, it was an adaptation. We learned that being responsible, capable, and self-sufficient was how we stayed safe, earned love, or kept our families afloat. Those strengths can serve us beautifully... until they become the reason we feel exhausted, isolated, and unable to ask for support.”
Pauline (@paulinethepsychologist)
“peace will feel boring at first if chaos raised you”
Alex Aubrey (@alexaubreypoetry)
“It's okay if someone doesn't like your boundary. That means it's working.”
Jefferson Fisher
“freedom begins the day you stop treating other people's comfort as your responsibility”
Alex Aubrey
“Someone told me that when they feel nervous about doing something & their heart starts beating really fast, that they call it their 'inner applause' because their body is cheering them on, and I think that's the cutest narrative adjustment ever.”
@poetsandwriters
“everything you dislike about yourself had a beginning, and most likely in your childhood. how quickly you apologize, because upsetting someone once had consequences. how needing anything feels like guilt, because you were praised for needing less. you learned it. you adapted. you survived. but you don't need to learn how to be whole. you were born that way.”
The Rebirth of You, quoted in a reel (the author's name is not in the save)
“Noticing the knot in my stomach before I agree to something. Asking 'do I want to, or do I just not want them upset?' If you've tried all 8 and you still can't say no without guilt, that's not a personality flaw.”
@taylortalkstherapy__, from a list of eight non-therapy habits
The check
Window of tolerance is Dan Siegel's phrase, from The Developing Mind (1999): the band of arousal inside which you can feel something and still think. The half of the slide people skip, that the band also has a ceiling for good feeling, is real. Fear of happiness has its own measurement scale (Gilbert and colleagues, 2012), and the pattern where joy triggers bracing is described in the trauma literature as intolerance of positive affect. The model is clinical shorthand rather than a number you can measure, and it is honest to say so.
The freeze slide is closer to right than it sounds. The defense cascade (Schauer and Elbert, 2010) runs freeze, flight, fight, fright, flag, faint; immobility is what the system does when neither running nor fighting would work. The 'calculation' is not a decision you made. It is older than decisions. Hypervigilance as a learned skill is verified in the plainest way possible: physically abused children identify anger in faces faster and from less information than other children (Pollak and colleagues, 2000; Pollak and Sinha, 2002). Reading the room was training.
'Healed in relationship' is the best-supported line in the whole folder. Earned security is a real category: adults who had hard childhoods and became secure anyway look, on the outcomes that matter, like people who were secure all along (Roisman, Padrón, Sroufe and Egeland, 2002). Across psychotherapy, the relationship itself is the most consistent predictor of change; the alliance meta-analysis puts it at r = .28 across nearly 300 studies (Flückiger and colleagues, 2018).
Hyper-independence as adaptation is not a therapist's coinage. Bowlby named it compulsive self-reliance in 1977, one of the shapes attachment takes when care was unreliable. The immigrant-daughter version has its own literature: parentification (Boszormenyi-Nagy and Spark, 1973; Hooper, 2007), and language brokering, where the child who translates for the family gains competence and carries stress at the same time (Kam and Lazarevic, 2014).
Peace feeling boring if chaos raised you rests on two mechanisms, both replicated. Self-verification (Swann, 1983; Swann, Stein-Seroussi and Giesler, 1992): people prefer partners who see them the way they already see themselves, even when the view is unkind. And misattribution of arousal (Dutton and Aron, 1974): a racing heart gets read as attraction. Chaos feels like chemistry because the body cannot tell the two apart. The boundary lines hold on the spotlight effect (Gilovich, Medvec and Savitsky, 2000): other people notice and remember what you did far less than you fear.
Two more slides hold on quieter literatures. Being regulated all the time is not the goal matches regulatory flexibility, where the healthy pattern is switching strategies to fit the moment rather than staying calm (Bonanno and Burton, 2013). Healing not being linear matches the sudden-gains finding that change in therapy arrives in jumps and dips rather than along a slope (Tang and DeRubeis, 1999).
Two flags. The parts slide is Internal Family Systems (Schwartz); the frame is useful and the trials are few. And the last of the nine slides, that the body kept what the mind could not hold, is the one line in the cluster memory scientists push back on: traumatic events are usually remembered too well, not repressed (McNally, Remembering Trauma, 2003). It stays on the page as a metaphor, not a mechanism.
The inner-applause line is a study in a cuter coat. Telling yourself the racing heart is excitement, rather than trying to calm it, improved singing, speaking, and math performance and the feeling itself (Brooks, 2014); the arousal stays, the story about it changes. The childhood-origin lines hold in outline, since adaptations that once kept a child safe are the mechanism the Pollak work in these sources describes; 'you were born whole' is a stance, not a finding, and is kept as one.
What it connects to
“I struggle with the idea of having capacity for all the good things life brings. Not that I can't hold it — that I don't trust myself to hold it without something breaking.”
Jennisms, truths
“Boundaries from having had none. The most boundaried people used to have none at all.”
Jennisms, the primitives
The window slide is that capacity truth said by someone else, with a mechanism attached: a ceiling that can be raised rather than a flaw to fix. The job it implies is not to grip harder but to stay inside the good thing long enough for the body to learn it is allowed. The boundary slide and the boundary primitive make the same claim from two directions. The hyper-independence line earns its place because it names the strength and the bill in one sentence.
Perspective, then ask.
A Roman emperor, an ex-spy, and a relationship writer saying one thing three ways: what disturbs you is the read of the thing, and the fastest way out of your own read is to go stand in someone else's. The research adds a correction.
The saved lines
“The external isn't what disturbs us, but rather our judgment of the external. We are only victims of our own thinking.”
a Marcus Aurelius card (@mymind), paraphrasing the Meditations
“Most people move through life trapped inside their own interpretation of events, seeing everything only through their personal lens. The real advantage comes when you step outside of yourself and begin observing situations from another angle. By mentally placing yourself in their position, you access information they aren't considering.”
Andrew Bustamante, former CIA officer, on perception versus perspective (via @motivationalwallet)
“Sometimes your partner isn't telling you something because they expect you to fix it. They're trying to help you understand what the situation feels like from where they're standing. Before jumping in with solutions, try to cross the bridge to their side first. Ask yourself, 'If I were experiencing this the way they are, what would I need from the person I love?'”
the Bridge Theory, from Busayo Joan's list of relationship theories
“the part of us that needs them to meet us, to consider, to have the desire, to see things clearly, is the part of us that has just stepped away from ourSelves because the Truth never really needs defending. The exhale finally comes when we control what's controllable, and how someone else chooses to see it will always be our work to let go.”
Dene Logan
“you are not responsible for correcting every false version of you that exists in someone else's head”
Alex Aubrey
““I'm really glad you told me that.” Whatever you reward, people will do more of.”
Charles Duhigg (@charlesduhigg), one of seven lines
““What's the most important part of this for you?” It shows them you want to learn about them.”
Charles Duhigg
““Let me make sure I actually got that.” Then say what you heard, in your own words.”
Charles Duhigg
““I could be wrong about this.” Four words that lower every defense in the room.”
Charles Duhigg
““What does this look like from where you're standing?” You're handing them the microphone.”
Charles Duhigg
““Can I tell you why I'm asking?” It turns a nosy question into an invitation.”
Charles Duhigg
“The deepest tier: end on 36. Share a real problem and let them mirror your feelings back. That final loop is what turns a stranger into someone who knows you.”
Charles Duhigg, on Arthur Aron's 36 questions
“Behind almost every frustrating behavior is an unmet need, a fear, or a hurt the person may not even have words for yet. Assumption stops at the behavior. Curiosity reaches for what's underneath it—and that's where the connection lives.”
Dr. Dan (@dr.dan.phd)
The check
The Aurelius card is a paraphrase of Meditations 8.47: if you are pained by an external thing, it is not the thing that disturbs you but your judgment about it, and you can wipe out the judgment now. Cognitive therapy is that sentence turned into a method. Albert Ellis credited Epictetus by name, and reappraisal, changing the read to change the feeling, is one of the most tested regulation strategies there is (Gross, 1998; Webb, Miles and Sheeran, 2012). Two thousand years and a meta-analysis agree.
The spy's version needs a correction. Perspective-taking does improve how negotiations and relationships go (Galinsky, Maddux, Gilin and White, 2008). It does not make you more accurate about what the other person actually thinks. Imagining their view is roughly as good as guessing; asking them is what works (Eyal, Steffel and Epley, 2018, which they titled 'perspective mistaking'). So the Bridge Theory is right, and the divorce lawyer in the next thread is right: the crossing helps the relationship, and the asking is what gets the accuracy. The caveat is the useful part.
The Dene Logan line and the Aubrey line are the control dichotomy, Epictetus again: what other people think of you is not up to you. The research adds that they think about you less than you fear. The spotlight effect (Gilovich, Medvec and Savitsky, 2000): people overestimate how much others notice and remember what they did.
The asking half got its evidence in this read. People who ask more questions, especially follow-up questions, are liked more and are read as more responsive, and they do not expect it (Huang, Yeomans, Brooks, Minson & Gino, 2017; the paper carries a 2025 correction that leaves the finding standing). 'I could be wrong' is intellectual humility, which predicts actually reading the other side's reasons (Porter & Schumann, 2018). 'Let me make sure I got that' is what Duhigg calls looping for understanding (Supercommunicators, 2024), the responsiveness the Reis and Shaver model already here describes. The 36 questions are real: Aron and colleagues (1997) produced closeness between strangers in forty-five minutes with escalating self-disclosure. The unmet-need line is the clinical version of the same instruction; it is a stance about where to point curiosity, and the asking research is why it works.
What it connects to
“Show up, don't control. Presence over outcome. My job is to be here, not to manage how it ends.”
Jennisms, the primitives
The primitive already lives on the Jennisms page; this thread is its mechanism, and the research supplies the correction the primitive did not have. Reading a room well is not the same as knowing what is in it. Imagining what someone feels is roughly as good as guessing; the question, asked out loud, is the evidence-based version. It is less elegant than the read, and it is what works.
The love is in the small returns.
Fifteen relationship 'theories' from one carousel, a divorce lawyer, and a chimpanzee. Most of the theories are folk names for findings that exist. The check is which ones.
The saved lines
“The Bird Theory: Sometimes your partner will randomly point out something small, a bird outside the window, something funny they saw, a random thought they had. It may seem insignificant, but what they're really saying is, 'Hey, look at this with me.' And there's something lovely about being the person someone instinctively turns to when something delights them, bothers them, surprises them, or simply makes them think, 'I need to tell my person this.'”
Busayo Joan (@busayo_joan)
“The Ketchup Theory: Imagine you accidentally spill ketchup on the counter and your partner sees it. Do they immediately sigh, get irritated, and make you feel stupid? Or do they simply help you clean it up? You learn a lot about love from how someone treats you when you make a small mess.”
Busayo Joan
“The Hold-Back Theory: Loving someone properly also means knowing when to say, 'No, you don't have to do that for me.' It means not taking advantage of how much they're willing to give. You shouldn't become so comfortable being loved that you start benefiting from your partner constantly reducing themselves to make you happy.”
Busayo Joan
“The Mosaic Theory: The longer you love someone, the more pieces of them become part of you. You start picking up their phrases, trying foods they introduced you to, seeing the world through perspectives they gave you. You don't stop being yourself, you simply become a little bigger.”
Busayo Joan
“Ask what makes me feel loved. That takes real bravery.”
James Sexton, divorce lawyer
“Giving can be the greatest act of receiving if you frame it right.”
Jefferson Fisher
“Wounda, a chimpanzee rescued near death in 2004, was released onto a protected forest island in 2013. She stopped before heading into her new home, turned back to Jane Goodall, and hugged her. She went on to become the alpha female of her group and later had a daughter named Hope.”
the Jane Goodall clip (@femalequotient), paraphrasing the caption
“Getting home. Making dinner. Calling someone back. There is so much life inside the things we barely think to celebrate.”
@wetheurban
“Grateful for waking up today. Grateful for clean water. Grateful for a roof over my head. Grateful for the air in my lungs. Grateful for laughter. Grateful for the chance to try again. Grateful for kind people. Grateful for another day to live this life.”
@wetheurban, a list of sixteen
“No matter how busy you are, don't forget to rest well, eat well, and love yourself.”
@brokenquotes.in
“You're never going to find the perfect person. You're only going to find someone who's dying to make you happy, someone who loses their mind over you from second one. And that person, the one who's ride-or-die with you through it all, that's the real perfect person.”
@29lessons, from You're Going to Die and You Haven't Started Living Yet
The check
The Bird Theory is John Gottman's 'bids for connection' with a better name. In his newlywed follow-up, couples still married six years later had turned toward each other's small bids 86 percent of the time; the couples who divorced, 33 percent (The Relationship Cure, 2001). The 5:1 ratio in the same carousel is his too, five positive exchanges for every negative one during conflict in stable couples (Gottman and Levenson, 1992). Both hold, with one honesty flag: the famous claim that the Four Horsemen predict divorce with 90 percent accuracy was fit to the data after the fact, not tested on new couples (Heyman and Slep, 2001). Contempt is still the strongest single predictor. The ratio is a description, not a recipe.
The Ketchup, Orange Peel, Shoelace and 7-Second theories are one construct with four names: perceived partner responsiveness, whether the other person notices, understands and acts (Reis and Shaver, 1988), and how they respond when something small goes right or wrong (Gable, Reis, Impett and Asher, 2004). Verified, repeatedly. The Mosaic Theory is Aron and Aron's self-expansion model almost word for word, love as including the other in the self (1986; the measurement scale is literally two overlapping circles, 1992). The Triangular Theory is Sternberg (1986) and it survived a 25-country validation (Sorokowski and colleagues, 2021). Social Exchange is Thibaut and Kelley (1959), refined into Rusbult's investment model. The surprise is how little of it was folk. Under the cute names, a carousel written for engagement had reproduced forty years of the relationship literature almost line for line, which says something about how the studies travel now: not as citations, as bird theories.
The Hold-Back Theory is the surprise: it holds. Equity theory (Walster, Walster and Berscheid, 1978) found that people who get more than they give are also less satisfied; they feel guilt instead of resentment. Being over-loved corrodes too. The 2-2-2 rule has no study behind it; the thing under it does, since couples who do novel, exciting things together report higher satisfaction (Aron and colleagues, 2000). The divorce lawyer beats the love-languages industry: a 2024 review found no support for the five-languages model's core claims (Impett, Park and Muise), and asking what makes someone feel loved is the evidence-based version. Jefferson Fisher's giving line holds on a different literature: spending on others raises happiness more than spending on yourself (Dunn, Aknin and Norton, 2008).
Celebrating the ordinary is a trained skill with a literature. Deliberately attending to small positive moments raises well-being (Bryant & Veroff, 2007; Quoidbach, Berry, Hansenne & Mikolajczak, 2010), and a weekly list of things to be grateful for produced measurable gains in mood, and even sleep, in the first controlled trials (Emmons & McCullough, 2003). The 'perfect person' reframe is a growth belief about relationships, and growth beliefs beat destiny beliefs for persistence and coping when things go wrong (Knee, 1998). The list format matters less than the noticing.
What it connects to
“Notice life together. The purest love is wanting someone to notice life with you.”
Jennisms, the primitives
The Bird Theory is that primitive with a study behind it, and the primitive was on the page first. What the check adds is permission to count the small returns as data: the bird pointed at, the mess cleaned up without a sigh, and no grade for the size of the gesture. The Hold-Back Theory works in the other direction. Equity theory finds that the over-benefited partner feels guilt rather than gratitude, so a gift can be over-sized; the care has a right size.
Some sorrow you only see through.
One Murakami passage performed by an actor, a poem in a notes app, and a letter a man wrote to a friend who was dying. The smallest thread, and the one to read most carefully.
The saved lines
“No truth can cure the sorrow we feel from losing a loved one. No truth, no sincerity, no strength, no kindness can cure that sorrow. All we can do is see it through to the end and learn something from it. But what we learn will be no help in facing the next sorrow that comes to us without warning.”
Haruki Murakami, Norwegian Wood, performed by Russell Geoffrey Banks
“because we're human & we leave claw marks in everything we've ever loved.”
Tara Kruyt (@tarakruyt), the oldest save in the folder
“My much loved friend, it matters that you have been loved. Nothing else matters.”
Peter Thompson, in a letter to his friend the theatre director Clare Venables as she was dying, read aloud in a reel; the letter is reproduced in Sheila Hancock's The Two of Us
“It's like staying furious at the parent who'll never apologize, because the fury lets you skip the sorrow of a childhood you can't get back. Grief isn't weakness. In fact, grief felt fully shows you how deeply you loved.”
Joe Hudson (@joehudson_aoa)
“But in a solitary life, there are rare moments when another soul dips near yours, as stars once a year brush the earth. Such a constellation was he to me.”
Madeline Miller, Circe (2018)
“And you will always know what time it is in Hong Kong, for you love someone who lives there. And love will simply have no choice but to go into battle with space and time and, furthermore, to win.”
James Baldwin, Nothing Personal (1964)
The check
Murakami is doing something the grief research took decades to confirm. There are no stages. Kübler-Ross wrote about the dying, not the bereaved, and the tidy sequence does not appear when you follow mourners over time; the most common trajectory is resilience, and the rest do not proceed in order (Bonanno, 2004). 'What we learn will be no help in facing the next sorrow' matches the finding that each loss behaves like its own event rather than a skill you have already trained.
The claw marks and the letter belong to the same idea: continuing bonds (Klass, Silverman and Nickman, 1996). The old model said grief work meant detaching. The evidence said people who keep the relationship in a new form, carrying it, do fine and often better. You do not give the marks back.
The anger-instead-of-grief line has a clinical name. Anger as the secondary emotion that keeps sadness at bay is standard in emotion-focused therapy (Greenberg, 2002), and the Bonanno work already here says grief felt fully is not grief prolonged; most people are resilient, and feeling it is not what breaks them. Miller and Baldwin are not claims to check. They are the thing the research keeps measuring badly, and the Baldwin passage is verified as his (Nothing Personal, 1964), which matters in a folder where most of the famous names are wrong.
What it connects to
“Nothing is wasted. Every chapter has value. If they leave, thank them for it.”
Jennisms, the primitives
This is the primitive the thread tests hardest, and it survives with an edit. Not that a loss teaches how to lose the next thing; Murakami and Bonanno agree that it does not. What is not wasted is the love itself, which stays legible in the marks. The letter, read as an instruction rather than a comfort, sets the standard: the people who are loved should be able to say the sentence about themselves.
Name it, or laugh at it.
A reel about emotions we have not learned the names for, and a stack of jokes about brains that will not power down. Different tones, one mechanism: getting a feeling out of the body and into language. The thread recurs because of cost: the feeling with no name is the one that takes a whole evening.
The saved lines
“Have you ever felt something you couldn't put into words? Not exactly sadness. Not quite happiness either. Just this strange feeling sitting quietly inside you, asking to be understood. I wonder how many of us are carrying emotions we haven't learned the names for yet.”
@cosmosbyrudra
“one thing you can't take away from me is laughter. i laugh even on my worst days”
@best.memory__
“unfortunately for all of you I have eyes, ears, reading comprehension and access to the internet.”
Mindi (@mindi_unmasked_mom)
“sometimes tired isn't about sleep, but about a mind that never gets a break”
Alex Aubrey
“Sonder: the sudden realization that every stranger you pass has a life as full and complicated as yours. Kenopsia: the eerie feeling of seeing a familiar place completely empty. Altschmerz: the exhaustion of dealing with the same old problems over and over again.”
Phoebe (@bigpheebs), glossing John Koenig's The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows
“Exulansis: the frustration of trying to explain an experience that is too personal or complicated for another person to understand. Adronitis: the frustration of how long it takes to truly get to know someone. Anecdoche: a conversation where everyone is talking, but nobody is really listening.”
Phoebe (@bigpheebs)
“How quickly 'I'm fine' can mean 'I don't know how to ask you to care.' How often 'independent' means depending on people stopped feeling safe a long time ago.”
@innerwovencollective, from a list of things a trauma therapist cannot unsee
The check
Naming works, and it works below the level of insight. Putting a feeling into words lowers amygdala activity while the feeling is happening (Lieberman and colleagues, 2007; reviewed in Torre and Lieberman, 2018), and people with finer emotional vocabularies, high granularity, regulate better and reach for fewer bad coping strategies (Kashdan, Barrett and McKnight, 2015). The reel is right in the strong sense. The missing name is not decoration; it is a tool you do not have yet. The last folder had the same thread, a carousel naming sonder, saudade, limerence and anticipatory grief, with the caption that the feeling was never too much, it just needed a name.
Laughter is a regulation strategy with its own literature. Humor styles research (Martin and colleagues, 2003) splits it in four: affiliative and self-enhancing humor, laughing with people and at your own week, track with wellbeing; aggressive and self-defeating humor, laughing at others or at yourself in order to be liked, track the other way. The folder is almost entirely the first two kinds.
Koenig's words are inventions (The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows, 2021), and that is the point of the check: the benefit of naming does not require an old word. Emotional granularity, the capacity to tell feelings apart finely, is what predicts better regulation (Kashdan, Barrett & McKnight, 2015, already here), and a coined word that carves one feeling off from another is granularity by hand. One caveat: a word only you know is a private label, and the social half of naming, being understood, needs the other person to have the word too. The 'I'm fine' decoding is the same mechanism run on someone else's sentence.
What it connects to
“I have a degree in expressing feelings.”
Jennisms, truths
The jennism is the joke version of a regulation skill, and this thread is its syllabus. A feeling with a name is a feeling that can be stayed with; the research says the naming is the staying-with, measurably, at the level of the amygdala. The jokes in the folder are the same act, faster: a name for the thing that lets it be held at arm's length for a second. The humor-styles split is the watch item: which kind of joke it is.
The hero is ten years ahead.
A speech about chasing your future self, a list about lists, thirteen ways of thinking, and eleven sentences from a poet about negotiating with comfort. The becoming thread, and the one to trust least, because it is the easiest kind of thing to save instead of do.
The saved lines
“My hero is always ten years away. I'm never gonna be my hero. I'm not gonna attain that, and that's just fine with me, because that keeps me with somebody to keep on chasing.”
Matthew McConaughey, 2014 Oscar acceptance speech, as the reel retells it (@profitagnosis)
“Your brain isn't meant to remember everything. Create the right lists, clear your mind, and focus on what truly matters. An organized life starts with an organized mind.”
@therisebegins
“Metacognitive thinking: thinking about how you think, monitoring, evaluating, and adjusting your own reasoning in real time. Every other mode on this list gets sharper when you can watch yourself use it.”
the last of Daniel Pink's thirteen modes of high-level thinking
“you already know what to do, you're just negotiating with comfort”
Alex Aubrey
“what a privilege it is to grow into someone i used to need”
Alex Aubrey
“take the risk. worst case you learn, best case it changes your entire life”
Alex Aubrey
“You can't stop the waves, but you can learn how to surf.”
Jon Kabat-Zinn, quoted in the same carousel
“supporting another person's success will never ruin yours”
Alex Aubrey
“Practice any art, music, singing, dancing, acting, drawing, painting, sculpting, poetry, fiction, essays, reportage, no matter how well or badly, not to get money and fame, but to experience becoming, to find out what's inside you, to make your soul grow.”
Kurt Vonnegut, letter to Ms. Lockwood's class at Xavier High School, November 5, 2006 (via @infiniteb88ks)
“You get lost, miss trains, solve problems and survive. This quietly restores self-trust. After that, everyday fears started looking smaller. Confidence grows not from talking about courage, but from using it.”
@the_deep_thinker, from a book excerpt on travel
“Forgive yourself for not knowing earlier what only time could teach.”
@brokenquotes.in
“If you can overthink the worst why can't you overthink the best.”
@brokenquotes.in
“You have been assigned this mountain to show others it can be moved.”
@izzyutterson (the line has no author on record)
The check
The ten-years-ahead hero is possible selves (Markus and Nurius, 1986), and the reason it works is future-self continuity: the more vividly you can picture and feel for the person you will be, the more patiently you act on their behalf, in the lab and in retirement accounts (Hershfield and colleagues, 2011). It is a better version than goals, because the hero keeps moving.
The lists claim is verified, and not in the way the caption means. Unfinished tasks intrude on attention (the Zeigarnik effect), and simply making a plan for them, without doing them, removes the intrusion (Masicampo and Baumeister, 2011, a paper titled 'Consider it done!'). The organized mind is not a personality; it is externalized memory. The thirteen modes are mostly real, named ideas, Janusian thinking is Rothenberg (1971), metacognition is Flavell (1979), abduction is Peirce; the claim that 'the most successful people alive' use them is marketing. Kabat-Zinn's waves are his own line (Wherever You Go, There You Are, 1994) and the mindfulness evidence behind it is moderate and real (Goyal and colleagues, 2014).
Two lines get a caveat. The line about taking the risk holds because of affective forecasting: we reliably overestimate how bad the bad outcome will feel and how long it will last (Gilbert and colleagues, 1998; Wilson and Gilbert, 2003). But 'supporting another person's success will never ruin yours' is a stance, not a finding. Tesser's self-evaluation maintenance model (1988) shows that a close friend's success in a domain you care about does sting. Choosing to clap anyway is the practice; pretending it never costs is not.
Vonnegut's letter is real: November 5, 2006, to a class that had written to him, and he was the only author who answered; he died six months later. 'Confidence grows from using courage' is the mastery experience, the strongest of Bandura's four sources of self-efficacy (1977): you believe you can because you did, which is also why the travel example works and the pep talk does not. Forgiving the earlier self is not indulgence; self-compassion after a failure predicts trying again rather than quitting (Breines & Chen, 2012). The mountain line is a slogan with no author; kept for the stance, filed as unverified.
What it connects to
“Life and work are all the same thing. The care I put into something for a person is how I tell them they matter. The substrate changes. The commitment doesn't.”
Jennisms, stances
“The calmest people aren't lucky. They just have better systems.”
Jade Bonacolta, saved in the July folder
The care-through-craft stance, pointed inward. The plan-making study says the system is what lets the mind stop holding everything, which is the July line with a citation, and it quietly corrects the habit of treating calm as a trait a person has on a given day rather than a system built or not built. A mind that never gets a break is a sentence saved once and an idea saved three times in two weeks. The lists are not the personality; they are the break.
Let the compliment land.
The smallest thread in this read and the one that names a reflex the rest of the folder keeps circling: the compliment that gets handed straight back. One save says stop doing that, once, and watch what happens.
The saved lines
“Just once, let a compliment land without immediately handing it back.”
@outgrowandbecome, reading from I'm Allowed to Outgrow This
“Notice what you do the next time someone compliments you, genuinely, on something you did. Chances are it involves some version of deflection: a quick correction, a joke, an immediate redirect of praise back onto someone or something else entirely.”
@outgrowandbecome
The check
Deflection is common and it costs both sides. Givers underestimate how good a compliment makes the recipient feel and overestimate how awkward it will be (Zhao & Epley, 2021; Boothby & Bohns, 2021), so the compliment being handed back was already rarer than it felt to receive. On the receiving end, people who think less of themselves resist praise because it does not match the self-view, which is the self-verification work already in these sources, and a reframing exercise that asks what the compliment means and why the person said it made low self-esteem partners feel more secure for weeks afterward (Marigold, Holmes & Ross, 2007). The save is that intervention, almost word for word.
What it connects to
“I'm the classic person to reorient a compliment.”
Jennisms, truths
“Compliments I like: you're smart. You're funny. I like how you speak.”
Jennisms, values
The older jennism is the giver's cheat sheet; the new one is the receiver's confession. The research closes the loop: praise is undervalued on the way in, and reorienting it on the way out undervalues it again. Letting it land is a practice, and a cheap one.
What you give is what you are.
Four saves about generosity and its limits: what we give is who we are, people give what they carry, compassion that sees the whole person, and a list of eight habits for people who cannot say no. Read together they are one argument about giving from a full tank.
The saved lines
“There's a beautiful phrase that says: 'What we give doesn't always return, but what we give is always what we are.' And that hits hard.”
@brokenquotes.in
“People give what they carry inside. Confident people uplift. Kind people include. Mature people communicate. Healed people set boundaries. Secure people celebrate others. The way people treat you is often a reflection of what lives within them, not a measure of your worth.”
@jaemi.pierson
“Why I carry compassion. Because people can be wrong and still be wounded. Someone can hurt you from a place that once hurt them. Someone can be explainable and still accountable. Compassion grows up when it stops excusing harm and starts seeing the whole person clearly.”
Warpaint Journal (@warpaintjournal)
“Waiting 24 hours before saying yes to anything. Saying 'let me check and get back to you.' Taking 'sorry' out of emails that don't need it. Saying no without a three-paragraph explanation.”
@taylortalkstherapy__, four of eight habits
“the idea of a 'best friend' is just the highest form of tenderness like. it's the epitome of choosing someone over and over”
@fairycosmos
The check
Giving is good for the giver, measurably (Dunn, Aknin & Norton, 2008, already here), with one condition the folder keeps restating: it has to come from a full tank. Grant's split between selfless givers, who burn out, and givers who protect their own interests while giving, who do best of anyone, is the research version of the people-pleasing list (Grant, Give and Take, 2013). 'People give what they carry' is a projection claim and it holds in outline: how people treat others tracks their own state more than the target's worth, which is the compassion line read from the other side. 'Explainable and still accountable' is a stance, and the right one; nothing needs to be cited to hold both.
What it connects to
“Kind souls find each other.”
Jennisms, stances
“Life and work are all the same thing. The care I put into something for a person is how I tell them they matter. The substrate changes.”
Jennisms, stances
“Being unkind.”
Jennisms, fears
The care-through-craft stance and the fear of being unkind are the two ends of this thread. The research adds the term the folder was missing: giving from fullness is a practice with a failure mode, and the failure mode has a name. The compassion line is the correction to the fear: holding someone accountable and being unkind are not the same act.
Check the name on the quote.
The most-saved format in this read is the quote card: a sentence, a serif, a famous name. Checked one by one, seven of the names do not hold. The sentences are not bad; the authority is rented. The brief says research has to verify the platitude, and the first thing to verify is who said it.
The saved lines
“To live is the rarest thing in the world. Most people exist, that is all.”
Oscar Wilde, The Soul of Man Under Socialism (1891), via @philosomuse
“I see you everywhere, in the stars, in the river; to me you're everything that exists.”
Virginia Woolf, Night and Day (1919), a character's line, via @philosomuse
“Two intelligent people cannot fall in love; true love needs one idiot.”
card says Fyodor Dostoevsky, via @philosomuse
“The price of loving someone very much is never loving anyone again.”
card says Fyodor Dostoevsky, via @philosomuse
“The most terrifying freedom is discovering that even your suffering is your own fault.”
card says Fyodor Dostoevsky, via @philosomuse
“In the end, I believe there is nothing we do not need to be loved. Those who love us see us with their hearts and give us qualities beyond what we truly have. And those who refuse to love us will never be satisfied with all our efforts.”
card says Frida Kahlo, via @rosheth_xx
“One day you will ask me which is more important, my life or yours? I will say mine and you will walk away not knowing you're my life.”
card says Khalil Gibran, via @philosomuse
The check
Checked one by one. Wilde is real, from the 1891 essay. Woolf is real but it is dialogue from Night and Day, not a letter. Vonnegut's letter and Baldwin's Hong Kong passage, filed in other threads, are real. None of the Dostoevsky cards appears in his published work; they circulate on quote accounts and nowhere else. The Kahlo passage is in none of her diaries, letters, or interviews (Full Fact; Mental Floss). The Gibran line has no source in his books and lives only on quote sites. The sleeper effect is why the trick works: over time the message is remembered and the source forgotten, so a famous name attached early does its job even after the correction (Kumkale & Albarracín, 2004).
What it connects to
“It's not style over substance. Style is how substance lands. Make every word carry weight or cut it.”
Jennisms, stances
“I do not believe in absolutes. “All X are this.””
Jennisms, stances
The style-and-substance jennism is the whole thread. A quote card is style doing the work of substance, and the famous name is the substance it borrowed. Keeping the Dostoevsky sentences that still read true, without his name, is the honest version of the save.
The rule cuts both ways.
The saves that did not survive the check, the ones that survived with an asterisk, and the ones that were never claims to begin with.
“always remember nobody gives up on something they actually want to keep in their life”
via @3.01am
People give up on what they want all the time. Avoidant deactivation is precisely wanting closeness and fleeing it (Mikulincer and Shaver, Attachment in Adulthood, 2007), and depression, capacity and timing end things people wanted. The top comment on the post said the same. The true version is narrower, and it is the Ketchup Theory: what someone does when it is inconvenient is the evidence.
“Your body kept the memory your mind couldn't hold.”
Margeaux Feldman, slide nine
Contested. Traumatic events are usually remembered too well rather than repressed (McNally, 2003). Kept as a metaphor for how the body reacts before the story arrives, not as a claim about memory.
“supporting another person's success will never ruin yours”
Alex Aubrey
A stance, not a finding. Self-evaluation maintenance (Tesser, 1988) says a close other's success in your own domain does sting. Clapping anyway is a practice worth having; it is not free.
“The 2-2-2 rule: a date every two weeks, a weekend away every two months, a longer holiday every two years.”
Busayo Joan
No study behind the numbers. The finding under it is real: shared novel and exciting activity predicts relationship satisfaction (Aron and colleagues, 2000). The ritual is worth keeping; the arithmetic is not the finding.
“13 modes of high-level thinking the most successful people alive actually use.”
Daniel Pink
The modes are real, named ideas. 'The most successful people alive' is unfalsifiable marketing. Kept for the modes, not the promise.
“For some neurodivergent brains, silence can leave too much room for thoughts, while familiar audio gives the brain something predictable to focus on.”
@chris.unmasked, on falling asleep to true crime
The sleep-sound evidence is thin: a systematic review of noise as a sleep aid found low-quality, mixed results (Riedy and colleagues, 2021). Kept as a habit that works for a person, not a mechanism that holds for people.
“quantum physics is crazy because what do you mean every possible outcome of every choice you make actually happens, it just splits into a parallel timeline. which means if you want to quantum leap, you don't force an outcome. you change what you expect.”
@thebalancedblonde
Many-worlds is an interpretation of the mathematics, not a lever, and nothing in quantum mechanics moves because of what a person expects. The usable half lives under 'becoming' with a citation: expectations change effort (Bandura, 1977), not timelines.
“By next August 2027, you'll be wrapped in love, dancing in your new house, having slow mornings with your soulmate, financially abundant, secure, calm, and living in alignment.”
@femalempire.co
A wish, and a decent one. Positive fantasies on their own lower effort and outcomes (Oettingen & Mayer, 2002; Kappes & Oettingen, 2011); pairing the wish with the obstacle, which the authors call mental contrasting, is what moves things. Kept as the wish, with the obstacle to be supplied.
“When you are in a love affair with the love of your life, you think that what's really going on is that person is loving you. What's really going on is you're loving that person, and using that person as the excuse.”
Abraham-Hicks, via a reel
Channeled, so there is no claim to check. The usable half is real and already here: the feeling of love is produced in the lover, which self-expansion theory (Aron) says more plainly.
“Mother wound = your relationship with yourself. Father wound = your relationship with others.”
The Feminine Code, via @thoughtcatalog
A tidy map with no study behind the tidiness. Attachment research does not split the self and others by parent; both caregivers shape both (Bowlby; Mikulincer & Shaver, already here). Kept as a prompt, not a diagnosis.
“Every person in your life serves one of four roles: mirror, window, wall, or door.”
Scott D. Clary (@scottdclary)
A taxonomy, not a finding. Useful as a sorting question; it predicts nothing.
“You think you are an introvert because you like being alone. But in reality, you just love being at peace. And you're actually extroverted around people who bring you peace.”
Zachary Laid, via @letmedriveyoucrazy_
Introversion is a measured trait with decades of evidence behind it; feeling energized by particular people is real and does not change the trait. Kept as a reframe, not a reclassification.
“Enclothed cognition: studies showing that what you wear measurably changes how you perform cognitively.”
@thehollychronicle, from a list of things to research when bored
The lab-coat study (Adam & Galinsky, 2012) did not survive a preregistered high-powered replication (Burns and colleagues, 2019), and the original authors acknowledged it. The rest of that list, Girard's mimetic desire, the lipstick index, Aristotle on friendship, is a reading list, which is the right way to save it.
Never claims
The folder is also a person. A guided meditation for marathoners; 'if you run, I know exactly who you are'; a golden retriever who could not wait until 4:30; a 36-hour Chicago itinerary saved in August for obvious reasons; the debate-coach scene from The Great Debaters; donkeys captioned 'take what you need'; a Kermit meme about the coworker at 200 percent before 9 a.m.; and one 'weekly laugh break.' No check required. The second read adds a 300-square-foot New York apartment in Architectural Digest, a sea otter calming down in its mother's arms, and the same Gregory Alan Isakov song under half the reels.
Sources
- Siegel, D. (1999). The Developing Mind. Guilford.
- Gilbert, P., McEwan, K., Catarino, F., Baião, R., & Palmeira, L. (2012). Fears of compassion and happiness in relation to alexithymia, mindfulness, and self-criticism. Psychology and Psychotherapy, 85(4).
- Schauer, M., & Elbert, T. (2010). Dissociation following traumatic stress. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 218(2).
- Pollak, S. D., Cicchetti, D., Hornung, K., & Reed, A. (2000). Recognizing emotion in faces: Developmental effects of child abuse and neglect. Developmental Psychology, 36(5). Pollak, S. D., & Sinha, P. (2002). Developmental Psychology, 38(5).
- Roisman, G. I., Padrón, E., Sroufe, L. A., & Egeland, B. (2002). Earned-secure attachment status in retrospect and prospect. Child Development, 73(4).
- Flückiger, C., Del Re, A. C., Wampold, B. E., & Horvath, A. O. (2018). The alliance in adult psychotherapy: A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychotherapy, 55(4).
- Bowlby, J. (1977). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. British Journal of Psychiatry, 130.
- Boszormenyi-Nagy, I., & Spark, G. (1973). Invisible Loyalties. Hooper, L. M. (2007). The Family Journal, 15(3). Kam, J. A., & Lazarevic, V. (2014). Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43.
- Swann, W. B. (1983). Self-verification. Swann, W. B., Stein-Seroussi, A., & Giesler, R. B. (1992). Why people self-verify. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(3).
- Dutton, D. G., & Aron, A. P. (1974). Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4).
- McNally, R. J. (2003). Remembering Trauma. Harvard University Press.
- Marcus Aurelius, Meditations, 8.47 (trans. George Long).
- Gross, J. J. (1998). Review of General Psychology, 2(3). Webb, T. L., Miles, E., & Sheeran, P. (2012). Dealing with feeling. Psychological Bulletin, 138(4).
- Galinsky, A. D., Maddux, W. W., Gilin, D., & White, J. B. (2008). Why it pays to get inside the head of your opponent. Psychological Science, 19(4).
- Eyal, T., Steffel, M., & Epley, N. (2018). Perspective mistaking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(4).
- Gilovich, T., Medvec, V. H., & Savitsky, K. (2000). The spotlight effect in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2).
- Gottman, J. M. (2001). The Relationship Cure. Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1992). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(2). Heyman, R. E., & Slep, A. M. S. (2001). The hazards of predicting divorce without crossvalidation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(2).
- Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., Impett, E. A., & Asher, E. R. (2004). What do you do when things go right? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2).
- Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1986). Love and the Expansion of Self. Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4). Aron, A., et al. (2000). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2).
- Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93(2). Sorokowski, P., et al. (2021). Journal of Sex Research, 58(1).
- Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The Social Psychology of Groups. Rusbult, C. E. (1983). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1).
- Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and Research. Allyn & Bacon.
- Impett, E. A., Park, H. G., & Muise, A. (2024). Popular psychology through a scientific lens: Evaluating love languages. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 33(2).
- Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B., & Norton, M. I. (2008). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319(5870).
- Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience. American Psychologist, 59(1). Bonanno, G. A., & Burton, C. L. (2013). Regulatory flexibility. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(6). Tang, T. Z., & DeRubeis, R. J. (1999). Sudden gains and critical sessions in cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(6).
- Klass, D., Silverman, P. R., & Nickman, S. L. (Eds.). (1996). Continuing Bonds. Taylor & Francis.
- Lieberman, M. D., et al. (2007). Putting feelings into words. Psychological Science, 18(5). Torre, J. B., & Lieberman, M. D. (2018). Emotion Review, 10(2).
- Kashdan, T. B., Barrett, L. F., & McKnight, P. E. (2015). Unpacking emotion differentiation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(1).
- Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1).
- Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9). Hershfield, H. E., et al. (2011). Journal of Marketing Research, 48(SPL).
- Masicampo, E. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2011). Consider it done! Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(4).
- Rothenberg, A. (1971). The process of Janusian thinking in creativity. Archives of General Psychiatry, 24(3). Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 34(10).
- Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever You Go, There You Are. Goyal, M., et al. (2014). Meditation programs for psychological stress and well-being. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174(3).
- Gilbert, D. T., Pinel, E. C., Wilson, T. D., Blumberg, S. J., & Wheatley, T. P. (1998). Immune neglect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3). Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2003). Affective forecasting. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 35.
- Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 21.
- Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in Adulthood. Guilford.
- Riedy, S. M., Smith, M. G., Rocha, S., & Basner, M. (2021). Noise as a sleep aid: A systematic review. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 55.
- Murakami, H. (1987). Norwegian Wood (trans. Jay Rubin, 2000). Hancock, S. (2004). The Two of Us: My Life with John Thaw (for the Thompson letter to Clare Venables).
- Brooks, A. W. (2014). Get excited: Reappraising pre-performance anxiety as excitement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3).
- Huang, K., Yeomans, M., Brooks, A. W., Minson, J., & Gino, F. (2017). It doesn't hurt to ask: Question-asking increases liking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(3); correction 2025.
- Porter, T., & Schumann, K. (2018). Intellectual humility and openness to the opposing view. Self and Identity, 17(2). Duhigg, C. (2024). Supercommunicators. Random House.
- Aron, A., Melinat, E., Aron, E. N., Vallone, R. D., & Bator, R. J. (1997). The experimental generation of interpersonal closeness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(4).
- Zhao, X., & Epley, N. (2021). Insufficiently complimentary? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(2). Boothby, E. J., & Bohns, V. K. (2021). Why a simple act of kindness is not as simple as it seems. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(5).
- Marigold, D. C., Holmes, J. G., & Ross, M. (2007). More than words: Reframing compliments from romantic partners fosters security in low self-esteem individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2).
- Bryant, F. B., & Veroff, J. (2007). Savoring. Lawrence Erlbaum. Quoidbach, J., Berry, E. V., Hansenne, M., & Mikolajczak, M. (2010). Positive emotion regulation and well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(5). Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Counting blessings versus burdens. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2).
- Knee, C. R. (1998). Implicit theories of relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2). Greenberg, L. S. (2002). Emotion-Focused Therapy. American Psychological Association.
- Koenig, J. (2021). The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows. Simon & Schuster. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2). Breines, J. G., & Chen, S. (2012). Self-compassion increases self-improvement motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(9).
- Grant, A. (2013). Give and Take. Viking. Kumkale, G. T., & Albarracín, D. (2004). The sleeper effect in persuasion: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 130(1).
- Oettingen, G., & Mayer, D. (2002). The motivating function of thinking about the future. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5). Kappes, H. B., & Oettingen, G. (2011). Positive fantasies about idealized futures sap energy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(4).
- Adam, H., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). Enclothed cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4). Burns, D. M., Fox, E. L., Greenstein, M., Olbright, G., & Montgomery, D. (2019). An old task in new clothes: A preregistered direct replication attempt of enclothed cognition effects on Stroop performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 83.
- Miller, M. (2018). Circe. Little, Brown. Baldwin, J. (1964). Nothing Personal. Atheneum. Vonnegut, K. (2006). Letter to Ms. Lockwood's class, Xavier High School, November 5 (in Usher, S., Letters of Note, 2013). Wilde, O. (1891). The Soul of Man Under Socialism. Woolf, V. (1919). Night and Day. Full Fact and Mental Floss on the misattributed Kahlo passage; Wikiquote's sourced pages for Dostoevsky and Gibran, where none of the saved lines appears.
The lines kept about how to live, each one studied, live on Jennisms. The last folder, read the same way, became On Agape.