Navigate
HomeStart here
MusingsResearch & long-form
BuildingProjects & learnings
WorkProfessional practice
RunningTraining & races
AboutValues & identity
Life & PlacesCulture, food, travel, cities
ClosetDiningTravelTrypthequeCultureMusicScoresTattoosXiaoWashington, DCChicago
Notes & ArchiveJournals, essays, portfolio
JournalJennismsInteractivesPortfolioSite MapTour
Back to Culture

Books · Reference Shelf

The books,
up close.

The ones I keep returning to, organized by the big issues they speak to. Not a reading list. A reference shelf for the questions that won't leave me alone.

The centerpiece

The Human Condition

Hannah Arendt · 1958 · Political Philosophy

Why it matters

  • Introduced the concept of 'natality' as a counter to Heidegger's being-toward-death, reorienting political philosophy toward the capacity to begin rather than the confrontation with mortality.
  • The 'space of appearance' framework has been cited in over 15,000 academic works across political science, philosophy, and the humanities.
  • Consistently ranked among the most important works of twentieth-century political philosophy in academic surveys, including by the International Philosophical Quarterly.

Why I read it

Arendt makes one argument that I have never been able to put down. The 'who' you are — not your qualities, not your résumé, but the specific person disclosed through what you do and say — can only appear in a shared world. You cannot fully be yourself in private. Action needs witnesses, not because recognition feels good, but because the structure of human action requires plurality. That is a harder, stranger, and more useful claim than 'people need to be seen.' It means legacy is not about ego or permanence. It is about the fact that every act enters a world already occupied by others, and that is what gives it meaning.

“This disclosure of 'who' in contradistinction to 'what' somebody is — his qualities, gifts, talents, and shortcomings, which he may display or hide — is implicit in everything somebody says and does.”

Chapter V, §24 — The Disclosure of the Agent in Speech and Action

“The purest love is wanting someone to notice life with you.”

Jennisms — The primitives

Rhymes with · Notice life together.

A builder's reading

I build things. Pages, decks, systems, keepsakes for people I care about. I have spent hundreds of hours on artifacts that five people will ever see. Arendt is the only philosopher who makes that feel like a serious activity rather than a personality quirk.

Her concept of 'work' — as distinct from labor and action — is the fabrication of durable things that outlast their makers. A table, a building, a book. Work creates the stable world that action needs in order to appear. Without durable things, human life would be nothing but biological process and fleeting speech.

That is why I cannot stop reading this book. It says that the things you make — not the feelings you have, not the intentions you hold — are what constitute a human world. The artifact is the proof that someone was here and chose to leave something behind.

SourcesThe Human Condition — WikipediaHannah Arendt Center at Bard CollegeStanford Encyclopedia — Arendt

Witness and legacy

What completes a life once it is possessed. The argument that meaning is not private — that action, testimony, and creation require an audience to be real.

The Fire Next Time

James Baldwin · 1963 · Essay

witnesslegacyselfhood

“It is not permissible that the authors of devastation should also be innocent. It is the innocence which constitutes the crime.”

My Dungeon Shook; Down at the Cross

“Narratives must fight to be told. They struggle against lenses that might render them obsolete or works of fiction. Each word, whether spoken or mouthed, gasps for air so that it may have its true impact.”

Encomium of Strife — UChicago

Rhymes with · Keep what woke you.

Baldwin writes the book as a letter — to his nephew, to the country, to the reader. That form is the argument. Witness is not observation; it is testimony addressed to someone. Truth becomes real when it is spoken to another person. The Fire Next Time does for the moral register what Arendt does for the political: it says that experience left unspoken is experience left incomplete.

SourcesThe Fire Next Time — Wikipedia

Childhood and Society

Erik Erikson · 1950 · Developmental Psychology

legacygenerativity

“Generativity is primarily the concern in establishing and guiding the next generation.”

Chapter 7 — Eight Ages of Man, Stage VII: Generativity vs. Stagnation

“When you take responsibility for your own happiness, it gives you room to feed someone else's.”

The drawer — a saved line

Rhymes with · Nothing is wasted.

Erikson names the developmental turn that Arendt and Baldwin describe philosophically. Mature adulthood shifts from self-construction toward generativity — the concern for establishing and guiding the next generation. It is the psychological evidence for the claim that legacy is not vanity but a developmental need. Wade-Benzoni's intergenerational beneficence research extends this: people systematically sacrifice for future others they will never meet.

SourcesChildhood and Society — WikipediaWade-Benzoni — Intergenerational beneficence (AMR 2002)

Selfhood and becoming

How a person comes to possess themselves. The argument that the self is not given but constructed — through struggle, through escape, through the refusal to be defined by what others need you to be.

Escape from Freedom

Erich Fromm · 1941 · Social Psychology

selfhoodfreedomauthoritarianism

“To the degree to which the individual has not yet completely severed the umbilical cord which fastens him to the outside world, he lacks freedom; but these ties give him security and a feeling of belonging and of being rooted somewhere.”

Chapter 2 — The Emergence of the Individual and the Ambiguity of Freedom

“Any lesson you refuse to learn will repeat itself until you do.”

The drawer — after Freud

Rhymes with · Lessons repeat until you learn them.

Fromm's central question is why people flee from freedom once they get it. His answer: individuation is terrifying. Separating from external authority means standing alone with your choices, and most people would rather submit to a new authority than bear that weight. The book was written in 1941 — the immediate 'why' was fascism. But the mechanism is universal. Becoming yourself requires tolerating the isolation that comes with no longer belonging to the crowd.

SourcesEscape from Freedom — Wikipedia

Song of Solomon

Toni Morrison · 1977 · Novel

selfhoodinheritancenaming

“If you surrendered to the air, you could ride it.”

Part Two, Chapter 15 — The flight

“You still get to keep all the parts of yourself they woke up.”

The drawer — a saved line

Rhymes with · Keep what woke you.

Morrison writes the self as something that must be reclaimed — from family mythology, from inherited names, from the people who need you to stay legible. Milkman Dead spends the novel learning that his name, his family's history, and his own identity were never what he was told they were. The flight at the end is not escape but arrival: you can only leap once you know what ground you are leaping from.

SourcesSong of Solomon — Wikipedia

Authenticity and existence

What makes a life genuinely yours rather than borrowed. The existentialist argument that most people live according to what 'one' does — and the confrontation required to stop.

Being and Time

Martin Heidegger · 1927 · Phenomenology

authenticitymortalityselfhood

“Death, as the end of Dasein, is Dasein's ownmost possibility — non-relational, certain and as such indefinite, not to be outstripped.”

Division II, §52 — Being-toward-Death

“It is the move from anxious control to secure presence. From gripping and testing and bracing and trying to decode the outcome, to showing up, feeling all of it, and keeping what wakes me up.”

Jennisms — The throughline

Rhymes with · Accept the irreducible.

Heidegger argues that most human existence is inauthentic — absorbed in das Man, the 'they-self,' doing what one does. Authentic existence begins when you face your own death as the one possibility no one else can live for you. That confrontation produces resoluteness: choices that are genuinely yours. Arendt studied under Heidegger, absorbed this framework, and then rejected its conclusion. She replaced being-toward-death with natality, and the solitary self with plurality. You cannot understand why Arendt insists on witnesses without understanding the alternative she was refusing.

SourcesBeing and Time — WikipediaStanford Encyclopedia — Heidegger

Fear and Trembling

Søren Kierkegaard · 1843 · Existentialism / Theology

faithauthenticitythe individual

“The ethical expression for what Abraham did is, that he would murder Isaac; the religious expression is, that he would sacrifice Isaac; but precisely in this contradiction consists the dread which can well make a man sleepless, and yet Abraham is not what he is without this dread.”

Problema I — Is there a teleological suspension of the ethical?

“Kierkegaard's 'leap of faith' showed me that commitment often requires embracing paradox.”

Beginning and Next Chapter — Booth

Rhymes with · Show up, don't control.

Kierkegaard's Abraham stands alone before God with a demand that cannot be explained or justified to anyone else. The 'knight of faith' acts on a commitment so private it cannot be made legible in universal terms. This is the vertical objection to Arendt's thesis: meaning can be completed before God, alone, without witnesses. Whether you find that compelling or terrifying depends on whether you think ultimate commitments need an audience. Arendt did not.

SourcesFear and Trembling — WikipediaStanford Encyclopedia — Kierkegaard

Power and systems

How structures shape what is possible. The argument that the desire to witness, to be seen, to leave something behind is not purely individual — it is produced, disciplined, and sometimes foreclosed by the systems we live in.

The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism

Max Weber · 1905 · Sociology

rationalizationmeaningmodernity

“Specialists without spirit, sensualists without heart; this nullity imagines that it has attained a level of civilization never before achieved.”

Chapter V — Asceticism and the Spirit of Capitalism

“If you went back in time and fixed all your mistakes, you'd erase yourself.”

The drawer — Daniel @dadogeking

Rhymes with · Nothing is wasted.

Weber explains why the question of legacy feels so urgent in modernity. His thesis: rationalization and bureaucratization strip inherited meaning from life. The 'iron cage' of modern capitalism leaves individuals efficient but disenchanted — technically free but with no shared framework for why any of it matters. Arendt's insistence that action needs a public world is partly a response to the condition Weber diagnosed: a world where meaning has been rationalized away.

SourcesThe Protestant Ethic — WikipediaStanford Encyclopedia — Weber

Discipline and Punish

Michel Foucault · 1975 · Post-Structuralism

powersurveillancesubjectivity

“Visibility is a trap.”

Part Three, Chapter 3 — Panopticism

“If you're an anxious person, do everything for fun. Anxiety feeds on importance. Don't make everything a matter of life and death.”

The drawer — a saved line

Rhymes with · Feelings are data or fear.

Foucault is the skeptic at the table. His question to Arendt and Baldwin: is the desire to appear, to be witnessed, to disclose yourself in public actually a form of discipline? The panopticon works because the subject internalizes the gaze — you perform for an audience you cannot see. If that mechanism shapes modern subjectivity, then the 'space of appearance' is not just where freedom happens; it is also where power operates. Not a refutation, but a necessary complication.

SourcesDiscipline and Punish — WikipediaStanford Encyclopedia — Foucault
← Back to Culture